ArticleNeurogenetics2025
Schinzel-Giedion syndrome: communication, feeding and motor skills in 16 individuals.
Article in Neurogenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Schinzel-Giedion Syndrome (SGS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused by pathogenic SETBP1 gain-of-function variants. SGS medical features have been well described. Associated skills critical to quality of life have such as communication, feeding, and motor skills are yet to be characterised. Here we used standardised caregiver report tools to characterise these skills as well as the medical features, in 16 children with SGS (median = 5 years, 7 months, range 6 months to 12.5 years). Vineland-3 scores reflected severe impairment in communication, daily living, socialisation and motor skills. Average receptive and expressive language skills were equivalent to a 0-to-1-month-old. Average motor skills were slightly stronger with age equivalents of 2-months-old for gross motor skills and 4-months for fine motor skills. 13/16 (81%) children could attend to someone's voice, and 15/16 (94%) could make happy vocalisations. One individual (6%) could follow basic instructions. Despite a relatively homogenous phenotype, some children presented with relative strengths when compared to the rest of the cohort. Our expanded phenotype of SGS allows better targeted therapies and supports, highlighting the importance of early feeding intervention and augmentative and alternative communication (e.g., assistive technology for communication). Given the severity of the SGS profile, our data highlight the need for sensitive measurement tools for detecting subtle skill changes in SGS in response to precision medicine interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.