Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40859044›Full record

SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025

Chemotherapy in elderly patients with early breast cancer: a systematic review.

Miriam Fernández-Pacheco, Michael Gerken, Atanas Ignatov, Stephan Seitz, C Kowalski, Elisabeth C Sturm-Inwald, Maria Eleni Hatzipanagiotou, Olaf Ortmann

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miriam Fernández-PachecoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. MFernandezPacheco@csj.de.
Michael GerkenTumor Center, Institute for Quality Management and Health Services Research, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Atanas IgnatovDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Otto-Von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Stephan SeitzDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
C KowalskiGerman Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
Elisabeth C Sturm-InwaldDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Maria Eleni HatzipanagiotouDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Olaf OrtmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer is the most common cancer affecting elderly patients. However, they may not receive optimal oncological care. Reasons might be comorbidities, limited compliance with clinical guidelines, and insufficient evidence for guideline recommendations. In the present review, the evidence for the clinical benefit of chemotherapy (CHT) in the population of elderly women with breast cancer was examined.

methodsA systematic review of relevant literature in English identifying studies published from January 2000 to April 2023 was conducted. The analysis included studies on the application of CHT, effects on survival, and toxicities. We searched PubMed databases for relevant publications. In total, 24 studies were included in the present review.

resultsThe benefit of CHT in elderly patients was inconsistent. Results of this review indicate evidence for the benefit of CHT in healthy elderly patients with high-risk breast cancer (BC) and specific subtypes such as triple-negative or HER2-positive BC. Data from studies on pathological complete response rates (pCR) or surgical downstaging rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in different age groups are controversial.

conclusionResults from studies on the effects of CHT in elderly patients are insufficient to draw differentiated conclusions due to heterogeneity of the definition for "elderly" patients, the application of different drugs and dosages. Patients with high-risk BC may benefit from CHT.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyAntineoplastic AgentsAdjuvant chemotherapyBreast cancerElderly patientsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40859044
PMCPMC12589199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.