Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40859021›Full record

ArticleNature methods2025

Reconstruction of a connectome of single neurons in mouse brains by cross-validating multi-scale multi-modality data.

Feng Xiong, Lijuan Liu, Hanchuan Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Feng Xiong *New Cornerstone Science Laboratory, SEU-ALLEN Joint Center, Institute for Brain and Intelligence, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6927-8903
Lijuan LiuNew Cornerstone Science Laboratory, SEU-ALLEN Joint Center, Institute for Brain and Intelligence, Southeast University, Nanjing, China. lijuan-liu@seu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9548-6183
Hanchuan Peng *New Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Institute for Brain and Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. h@braintell.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3478-3942

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain networks, or connectomes, have inspired research at macro-, meso- and micro-scales. However, the rise of single-cell technologies necessitates inferring connectomes consisting of individual neurons projecting throughout the brain. Her, we present a scalable approach to map single-neuron connectivity at the whole-brain scale using two complementary methods. We first generated an arbor-net by probabilistically pairing dendritic and axonal arbors of 20,247 neurons registered to the Allen Brain Atlas. We also produced a bouton-net based on 2.57 million putative axonal boutons from 1,877 fully reconstructed neurons and probabilistic pairing of these full-morphology datasets. Cross-validation of both networks showed statistical consistency in spatially and anatomically modular distributions of neuronal connections, corresponding to functional modules in the mouse brain. We found that single-neuron connections correlated more strongly with gene coexpression than the full-brain mesoscale connectome. Our network analysis, comparing the connectomes with alternative brain architectures, identified nonrandom subnetwork patterns. Overall, our data indicate rich granularity and strong modular diversity in mouse brain networks.

Indexed as

BrainConnectomeNerve NetNeuronsSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsAxonsMice

Identifiers

PMID40859021
PMCPMC12695645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.