ArticleNature methods2025
Reconstruction of a connectome of single neurons in mouse brains by cross-validating multi-scale multi-modality data.
Article in Nature methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A mouse brain atlas based on dendritic microenvironments.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- A Multi-Scale Neuron Morphometry Dataset from Peta-voxel Mouse Whole-Brain Images.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Experimental quality control induces changes in Allen mouse brain connectomes.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain networks, or connectomes, have inspired research at macro-, meso- and micro-scales. However, the rise of single-cell technologies necessitates inferring connectomes consisting of individual neurons projecting throughout the brain. Her, we present a scalable approach to map single-neuron connectivity at the whole-brain scale using two complementary methods. We first generated an arbor-net by probabilistically pairing dendritic and axonal arbors of 20,247 neurons registered to the Allen Brain Atlas. We also produced a bouton-net based on 2.57 million putative axonal boutons from 1,877 fully reconstructed neurons and probabilistic pairing of these full-morphology datasets. Cross-validation of both networks showed statistical consistency in spatially and anatomically modular distributions of neuronal connections, corresponding to functional modules in the mouse brain. We found that single-neuron connections correlated more strongly with gene coexpression than the full-brain mesoscale connectome. Our network analysis, comparing the connectomes with alternative brain architectures, identified nonrandom subnetwork patterns. Overall, our data indicate rich granularity and strong modular diversity in mouse brain networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.