Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40858990›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026

Beyond Screen Formats: Towards Context-Aware, Patient-Centric ePRO Design in Clinical Trials.

Schawanya Kaewpitoon Rattanapitoon, Nav La, Patpicha Arunsan, Nathakapch Kaewpitoon Rattanapitoon

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Schawanya Kaewpitoon RattanapitoonFMC Medical Center, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. schawanya.ratt@g.sut.ac.th.
Nav LaFaculty of Medicine, International University, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Patpicha ArunsanFaculty of Medicine, Vongchavalitkul University, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Nathakapch Kaewpitoon RattanapitoonFMC Medical Center, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lord-Bessen et al. demonstrated that both single-item-per-screen and multiple-items-per-screen ePRO formats are acceptable, with minimal differences in usability and completion time. While format preference may be individual-specific, broader considerations-including patient cognitive load, device type, language complexity, and trial phase-are crucial for context-aware ePRO design. Future research should explore adaptive systems that dynamically adjust format in real time, subgroup analyses for older adults and low digital literacy participants, and language-specific validation. Moving beyond fixed formats toward adaptive, patient-tailored delivery can better align with regulatory priorities for patient-focused drug development, enhancing both participant experience and data integrity.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicElectronic Health RecordsHumansResearch DesignAdaptive designClinical trialsElectronic patient-reported outcomesPatient-centered researchUsability

Identifiers

PMID40858990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.