ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Shifting practice: Moving to a stent first approach for both left and right sided acute malignant large bowel obstruction (LBO).
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Recognition to Prevention: Modern Approaches to Complication Reduction in Colorectal Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the safety and efficacy of a change to a stent first approach for malignant large bowel obstruction (LBO) in both left and right colon in a single centre over a 4-year period.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study in an acute NHS Hospital Trust from 01/01/2019-31/12/2022 examines a change in practice from emergency surgery (ES) to colonic stenting for patients with both left and right sided acute malignant LBO. Co-primary outcomes were clinically successful bowel decompression following stenting and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, stent complications, stoma formation and minimally invasive surgery (MIS).
results68 patients underwent colonic stenting, and 29 patients underwent primary ES for acute malignant LBO. Stenting achieved successful bowel decompression in 77.9%. 30-day mortality for those initially stented was 7.4% and for ES 6.9%. In palliative patients initially treated with stenting the stoma rate was lower (15.4 vs. 100.0%) with a reduced rate of open surgery (5.1 vs 87.5%) when compared to ES. In curative patients initially treated with stenting the stoma rate was lower (37.9 vs. 80.1%) with an increased rate of MIS (69.0 vs 19.0%), when compared to ES. 27.9% of patients underwent stenting proximal to the splenic flexure.
conclusionsIt is possible to offer colonic stenting to > 80% of patients presenting with acute malignant LBO despite not having a 24/7 rota. There was a reduced rate of stoma formation, open surgery and length of stay in both palliative and curative patients undergoing primary colonic stenting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.