Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40858919›Full record

ReviewNeurology and therapy2025

Global Societal Burden of Alzheimer's Disease by Severity: a Targeted Literature Review.

Maria A Cavaco, Se Ryeong Jang, Christopher Olsen, Carolyn Bodnar, Nicole Ferko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Study on Regulatory Mechanism ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria A CavacoEVERSANA, Burlington, ON, Canada. maria.cavaco@eversana.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-3820
Se Ryeong JangEisai Inc, Nutley, NJ, US.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-0896
Christopher OlsenEVERSANA, Burlington, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4488-7653
Carolyn BodnarEisai Europe Ltd, Hatfield, UK.
Nicole FerkoEVERSANA, Burlington, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7099-7075

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlzheimer's disease (AD) is among the costliest of illnesses for the elderly, placing a significant burden on healthcare systems and caregivers. Despite the depth of evidence, reviews lack a holistic assessment of such costs, falling short of illustrating unmet medical needs. The objective of this review was to therefore characterize the total societal economic burden of AD, broken down by care setting and disease severity.

methodsA targeted literature search of systematic reviews, cost-of-illness, and observational studies published between 2013 and 2024 was conducted on MEDLINE and Embase to identify articles reporting the economic burden of AD. Grey literature was hand-searched. Both direct and indirect costs were assessed, including societal burdens not often reported by AD-specific cost-of-illness studies such as financial delinquencies.

resultsIn total, 81 articles were reviewed in depth, including 20 systematic reviews and 61 studies or reports. Findings consistently demonstrated that societal costs of AD or dementia typically increased by at least 50% between consecutive severity levels, increasing with disease progression. Informal caregiving often comprised close to half of societal costs, regardless of care setting, disease severity, or region. While studies reporting costs of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were limited, the economic burden reported for this stage was appreciable compared to mild AD. Evidence for the impact of AD, as early as MCI, on quality of life (e.g., emotional and mental strain) and personal financial management capabilities was also identified.

conclusionThis review provides a comprehensive overview, from studies spanning over more than a decade, of the substantial societal economic burden associated with AD, across cost categories, care settings, disease stages, and regions. This review may be used to inform health economic evaluations of novel interventions with potential to reduce the enormous and growing global economic burden of AD and dementia.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseCaregiver burdenDementiaDirect costsEconomic burdenIndirect costsQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID40858919
PMCPMC12450196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.