Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40858895›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2025

In vivo and in vitro evaluation of the Swiss LithoClast

Angelis Peteinaris, Vasileios Tatanis, Solon Faitatziadis, Theodoros Spinos, Aggelos Samaras, Paraskevi Katsakiori, Christodoulos Chatzigrigoriadis, Theofanis Vrettos, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Angelis PeteinarisDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece. peteinarisaggelis@gmail.com.
Vasileios TatanisDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Solon FaitatziadisDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Theodoros SpinosDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Aggelos SamarasDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Paraskevi KatsakioriDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Christodoulos ChatzigrigoriadisSchool of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Theofanis VrettosDepartment of Anesthesiology and ICU, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Evangelos LiatsikosDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Panagiotis KallidonisDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of the current study is the comparison between the Swiss LithoClast MATERIALS AND

methodsFor the in vitro setup, a PVC tube placed within a plastic box filled with saline solution was used. Five soft and five hard artificial stones were created and the lithotripters were evaluated until complete stone clearance. For the in vivo part of the study, four female pigs were used. After the achievement of percutaneous access, five soft and five hard artificial stones were placed in the pelvicalyceal system. Lithotripsy was conducted. A dynamometer was used to evaluate the force needed during the procedure, while the stone clearance time was recorded.

resultsTwenty in vitro and 20 in vivo trials were completed. The Swiss LithoClast

conclusionLithoClast

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiLithotripsyAnimalsEquipment DesignFemaleIn Vitro TechniquesSwineErgonomyLithoclast trilogyLithotripsyPercutaneous nephrolithotomyProne

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.