ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
In vivo and in vitro evaluation of the Swiss LithoClast
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- More energy, same results: high energy settings do not improve the efficiency of dual energy lithotripsy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Global perspectives on surgical instrument fit: unveiling challenges faced by urologists.World journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of the current study is the comparison between the Swiss LithoClast MATERIALS AND
methodsFor the in vitro setup, a PVC tube placed within a plastic box filled with saline solution was used. Five soft and five hard artificial stones were created and the lithotripters were evaluated until complete stone clearance. For the in vivo part of the study, four female pigs were used. After the achievement of percutaneous access, five soft and five hard artificial stones were placed in the pelvicalyceal system. Lithotripsy was conducted. A dynamometer was used to evaluate the force needed during the procedure, while the stone clearance time was recorded.
resultsTwenty in vitro and 20 in vivo trials were completed. The Swiss LithoClast
conclusionLithoClast
Indexed as
Identifiers
40858895What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.