ArticleScientific reports2025
Low-energy shock waves improve the bacterial detection of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on polyethylene.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing number of total joint arthroplasties and the associated increase in periprosthetic infections, the further development of non-invasive examination methods to improve bacterial detection is becoming increasingly important. This is particularly important in the case of biofilm-forming bacteria, where false-negative results from joint puncture can lead to a delay in optimal therapy, as the number of planktonic bacteria in the punctate can be low. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy, originally used in the treatment of urolithiasis, has demonstrated promising energy-dependent biofilm-disrupting and even antimicrobial properties against Staphylococcus aureus. High-energy shock waves have been shown to be effective in several studies, but they are often painful and not suitable for all patients. Utilizing shock waves could enhance pathogen detection rates and potentially enable the early initiation of targeted therapy. This study therefore investigates whether low-energy shock waves are suitable for removing bacteria from a Staphylococcus aureus biofilm on polyethylene. The aim of this study is to evaluate the applicability of this method to improve the diagnostic accuracy of periprosthetic infections. In an in vitro model, Staphylococcus aureus biofilms were cultured on polyethylene patellas for 48 h. Biofilm disruption by low-energy shock waves was tested using a ReflecTron hmt device, with shock waves applied in a range of 0-1800 impulses. Colony-forming units (CFU) and XTT assays (to quantify cell viability) were measured. Shock wave treatment with an energy of 0.13 mJ/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.