ArticleAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2025
Exploring enzymatically active bacterial diversity in decomposing cow manure: insights into biodegradation dynamics within the initial mesophilic phase.
Article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a multi-strain bacterial consortium: Enhancing cow manure composting efficiency and maize growth.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Microbial drivers of Black Soldier Fly biowaste valorization: from microbiome functions to scalable insect-microbe systems.AIMS microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the isolation and characterization of bacterial strains with enzymatic potential from cow manure undergoing a 6-day decomposition process (initial mesophilic heating). A total of 270 bacterial isolates were obtained, with 48 isolates exhibited ligninase, amylase, protease, lipase, cellulase, and xylanase activity. Morphological, biochemical and molecular characterization classified them into nine species. The enzymatic analysis revealed that Bacillus licheniformis exhibited the highest enzymatic activity for ligninase, lipase, and amylase, recording 1.13, 9.92, and 8.1 U/mL, respectively, compared to other bacterial species. Furthermore, B. subtilis exhibited the highest enzymatic activity for protease, xylanase, and cellulase, recording 3.33, 1.96, and 0.5 U/mL, respectively. Our study reported Acetobacter tropicalis and A. pasteurianus with enzymatic activity for lipase and amylase. We also identified Lactiplantibacillus plantarum with enzymatic activity for ligninase and xylanase, and Lacticaseibacillus casei with enzymatic activity for ligninase, cellulase, and xylanase. Additionally, we reported Lentilactobacillus buchneri with enzymatic activity for ligninase, amylase, protease, lipase, cellulase, and xylanase. Furthermore, our study identified Cereibacter sphaeroides with enzymatic activity for cellulase, xylanase, protease, and ligninase, and Streptomyces albidoflavus with enzymatic activity for ligninase. These findings expand the understanding of bacterial enzymatic capabilities with potential in biotechnology, waste degradation, and industrial enzyme production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40858871What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.