ArticleScientific reports2025
A comparative analysis of deep learning architectures for thyroid tissue classification with hyperspectral imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting depressive symptoms among Chinese college students using recurrent neural networks with longitudinal data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hyperspectral imaging has shown significant applicability in the medical field, particularly for its ability to represent spectral information that can differentiate specific biomolecular characteristics in tissue samples. However, the complexity of analyzing HSI data, due to its high dimensionality and the large volume of information, presents significant challenges. At the same time, deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks, has become an essential tool in medical diagnostics, providing detailed analysis across various contexts. These techniques enable the analysis of complex information often unattainable through traditional methods. This paper introduces a novel approach that integrates micro-FTIR spectroscopy with three different deep learning architectures, namely RNN, FCNN, and 1D-CNN, to compare their performance in region-based classification of thyroid tissues, including goiter, cancerous, and healthy types. The proposed deep learning methods were developed on a dataset of 60 patients and evaluated using grouped 10-fold cross-validation. The 1D-CNN achieved the highest scores in classifying the spectral data provided by micro-FTIR, enabling more precise and accurate region-based tissue classification. The 1D-CNN achieved an accuracy of 97.60%, while RNN and FCNN achieved 96.88% and 93.66%, respectively. These results highlight the effectiveness of this approach in enhancing the precision of thyroid pathology analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.