Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40858795›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Human dexterity and brains evolved hand in hand.

Joanna Baker, Robert A Barton, Chris Venditti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joanna BakerDivision of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Reading, Reading, UK. j.l.a.baker@reading.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4904-6934
Robert A BartonDepartment of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2150-9637
Chris VendittiDivision of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Reading, Reading, UK. c.d.venditti@reading.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6776-2355

Funding

Leverhulme Trust RL-2019-012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large brains and dexterous hands are considered pivotal in human evolution, together making possible technology, culture and colonisation of diverse environments. Despite suggestions that hands and brains coevolved, evidence remains circumstantial. Here, we reveal a significant relationship between relatively longer thumbs - a key feature of precision grasping - and larger brains across 95 fossil and extant primates using Bayesian phylogenetic methods. Most hominins, including Homo sapiens, have uniquely long thumbs, yet they and other tool-using primates conform to the broader primate relationship with brain size. Within the brain, we surprisingly find no link with cerebellum size, but a strong relationship with neocortex size, perhaps reflecting the role of motor and parietal cortices in sensorimotor skills associated with fine manipulation. Our results emphasise the role of manipulative abilities in brain evolution and reveal how neural and bodily adaptations are interconnected in primate evolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBrainHandAnimalsFossilsHominidaeHumansPhylogenyPrimates

Identifiers

PMID40858795
PMCPMC12381199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.