ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Bronchiectasis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: AI-based CT quantification using the bronchial tapering ratio.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of imaging-based pulmonary and extrapulmonary treatable traits in COPD: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAlthough chest CT is the primary tool for evaluating bronchiectasis, accurately measuring its extent poses challenges. This study aimed to automatically quantify bronchiectasis using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of the bronchial tapering ratio on chest CT and assess its association with clinical outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). MATERIALS AND
methodsCOPD patients from two prospective multicenter cohorts were included. AI-based airway quantification was performed on baseline CT, measuring the tapering ratio for each bronchus in the whole lung. The bronchiectasis score accounting for the extent of bronchi with abnormal tapering (inner lumen tapering ratio ≥ 1.1, indicating airway dilatation) in the whole lung was calculated. Associations between the bronchiectasis score and all-cause mortality and acute exacerbation (AE) were assessed using multivariable models.
resultsThe discovery and validation cohorts included 361 (mean age, 67 years; 97.5% men) and 112 patients (mean age, 67 years; 93.7% men), respectively. In the discovery cohort, 220 (60.9%) had a history of at least one AE and 59 (16.3%) died during follow-up, and 18 (16.1%) died in the validation cohort. Bronchiectasis score was independently associated with increased mortality (discovery: adjusted HR, 1.86 [95% CI: 1.08-3.18]; validation: HR, 5.42 [95% CI: 1.97-14.92]). The score was also associated with risk of any AE, severe AE, and shorter time to first AE (for all, p < 0.05).
conclusionsIn patients with COPD, the quantified extent of bronchiectasis using AI-based CT quantification of the bronchial tapering ratio was associated with all-cause mortality and the risk of AE over time. KEY POINTS: Question Can AI-based CT quantification of bronchial tapering reliably assess bronchiectasis relevant to clinical outcomes in patients with COPD? Findings Scores from this AI-based method of automatically quantifying the extent of whole lung bronchiectasis were independently associated with all-cause mortality and risk of AEs in COPD patients. Clinical relevance AI-based bronchiectasis analysis on CT may shift clinical research toward more objective, quantitative assessment methods and support risk stratification and management in COPD, highlighting its potential to enhance clinically relevant imaging evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40858775What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.