ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Pegaspargase administration and tolerability in patients aged 55 years or older with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with the LAL1913 program. A subanalysis of the Campus ALL group.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The adoption of pediatric-inspired regimens for the treatment of Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adults has improved prognosis. However, the feasibility of these intensive regimens in older patients is limited, due to the increased incidence of therapy-related side effects, including those related to asparaginase. In this sub-analysis carried out by the Campus ALL network, 90 ALL patients aged 55 or more (median age 59 years) homogeneously treated in real-life according to the GIMEMA LAL1913 program, were analyzed to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of pegaspargase (PEG-ASP) treatment. Among the 90 patients analyzed, 86 (96%) received PEG-ASP at least in one of the first two courses (C1-C2) of chemotherapy and were evaluated for toxicity and outcome. In detail, 51 patients received PEG-ASP in both courses and 35 in either C1 or C2. The most common adverse event was hepatic toxicity (HT), with 38% of patients experiencing any grade of HT at C1 (HT grade ≥ 3, 19%) and 23% at C2 (HT grade ≥ 3, 9%). Additionally, HT at C1 was the primary reason for withholding PEG-ASP at C2. Coagulopathy was the second most frequent toxicity (any grade of toxicity in 26% of patients at C1 and in 20% at C2). No deaths directly related to PEG-ASP therapy were reported. The CR rate after C1 and C3 was 94% and 93%, respectively. MRD negativity rate was 40% and 68%, respectively. The OS and DFS probability at 3 years was 54% and 47%, respectively. PEG-ASP administration in older ALL patients is feasible, but HT is a concern, being the major cause of PEG-ASP interruption. Therefore, a dose adjustment, according to age and concomitant comorbidities, is advisable to balance PEG-ASP efficacy with its toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.