ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2025
Typical distribution of hypertensive cerebral microbleed: a matched case-control study using primary aldosteronism.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The topographical distribution of non-strictly lobar cerebral microbleed (CMB) is considered as a neuroimaging marker of hypertensive arteriopathy, but pathological evidence remains insufficient. This case-control study assessed patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), a leading cause of secondary hypertension, to characterize the CMB distribution features of typical hypertensive arteriopathy. A PA group (n = 11) and an age-matched non-hypertensive control group (n = 22) were classified into subgroups based on the presence of any CMB or no CMB using paramagnetic-sensitive MRI. Patients with any CMB were further divided into strictly lobar CMB and non-strictly lobar CMB, defined as either strictly deep and/or infratentorial (D/I) CMB or "mixed" (i.e., CMB in both lobar and D/I regions). CMB prevalence was higher in the PA group (81.8% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.001), showing non-strictly lobar patterns in all cases. Total CMB count was also higher (median 3 vs. 0; p < 0.001). Adjusted odds ratios for any CMB and non-strictly lobar CMB were 80.24 and 89.89, respectively. These findings suggest that PA-related small vessel injury affects both deep and cortical/leptomeningeal arterioles, demonstrating a strong association between pure hypertensive small vessel disease and non-strictly lobar CMB distribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40858750What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.