ArticleScientific reports2025
Application of Brucella type IV secretion proteins VirB1, VirB5, and VirB6 in the serological diagnosis of brucellosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brucellosis, a significant zoonotic infectious disease caused by Brucella spp., necessitates the development of efficient, rapid, accurate, and cost-effective diagnostic methods. This study evaluated the diagnostic value of Brucella Type IV secretion proteins VirB1, VirB5, and VirB6 for human brucellosis serological diagnosis. A total of 100 positive serum samples, 96 negative serum samples, and 27 serum samples from patients with fever caused by other pathogens were collected. Recombination VirB1 (rVirB1), rVirB5, and rVirB6 were expressed using prokaryotic expression systems, while VirB2 and VirB7 were synthesized as peptides. An indirect ELISA method was established using purified proteins and synthetic peptides, with sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and cut-off values determined through ROC analysis. The study successfully prepared rVirB1 (~ 36 kD, purity 90.6%), rVirB5 (~ 32 kD, purity 90.3%), and rVirB6 (~ 28 kD, purity 94.9%). These proteins exhibited sensitivity and specificity exceeding 0.9500 and 0.9271, respectively, comparable to traditional LPS antigens. Cross-reactivity assessments revealed that rVirB1 exhibited cross-reactivity with Pseudomonas putrida, while rVirB5 and rVirB6 showed no cross-reactivity. In contrast, LPS exhibited 14 instances of cross-reactivity. This study successfully developed an indirect ELISA diagnostic method using rVirB1, rVirB5, and rVirB6, demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy comparable to traditional LPS antigen detection techniques. Although some cross-reactivity was observed, the method presents a promising new candidate for the serological diagnosis of brucellosis. Future research should focus on optimizing this method to enhance diagnostic specificity and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.