ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
A Fully Automated 3D CT U-Net Framework for Segmentation and Measurement of the Masseter Muscle, Innovatively Incorporating a Self-Supervised Algorithm to Effectively Reduce Sample Size: A Validation Study in East Asian Populations.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe segmentation and volume measurement of the masseter muscle play an important role in radiological evaluation. Manual segmentation is considered the gold standard, but it has limited efficiency. This study aims to develop and evaluate a U-Net-based coarse-to-fine learning framework for automated segmentation and volume measurement of the masseter muscle, providing baseline data on muscle characteristics in 840 healthy East Asian volunteers, while introducing a self-supervised algorithm to reduce the sample size required for deep learning.
methodA database of 840 individuals (253 males, 587 females) with negative head CT scans was utilized. Following G. Power's sample size calculation, 15 cases were randomly chosen for clinical validation. Masseter segmentation was conducted manually in manual group and automatically in Auto-Seg group. The primary endpoint was the masseter muscle volume, while the secondary endpoints included morphological score and runtime, benchmarked against manual segmentation. Reliability tests and paired t tests analyzed intra- and inter-group differences. Additionally, automatic volumetric measurements and asymmetry, calculated as (L - R)/(L±R) × 100%, were evaluated, with the clinical parameter correlation analyzed via Pearson's correlation test.
resultsThe volume accuracy of automatic segmentation matched that of manual delineation (P > 0.05), demonstrating equivalence. Manual segmentation's runtime (937.3 ± 95.9 s) significantly surpassed the algorithm's (<1 s, p < 0.001). Among 840 patients, masseter asymmetry was 4.6% ± 4.6%, with volumes of (35.5 ± 9.6) cm
conclusionThe U-Net-based algorithm demonstrates high concordance with manual segmentation in delineating the masseter muscle, establishing it as a reliable and efficient tool for CT-based assessments in healthy East Asian populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40858739What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.