ArticleCommunications biology2025
Evaluating in-vivo spontaneous firing rate in the brain based on neuronal noise modeling.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Even without external stimuli, neurons produce spontaneous bursts of activities. Theoretical and practical clinical considerations, suggest the importance of determining the in-vivo statistical profile of those spontaneous spikes bursts, however this task has not been accomplished yet. Currently, it is only accepted that the in-vivo value of the mean firing rate (λ) of those spontaneous bursts is below 0.1Hz, without knowing its specific value and its population distribution. Here we propose a framework to evaluate the neurons' λ during rest of a given subject, using stochastic signal processing analysis of in-vivo brain fMRI and EEG. Our main hypothesis is that during rest the input to the neurons is mostly formed by a random neuronal noise, and although it fluctuates with zero mean, it affects the neurons' signal output characteristics. Our results based on in-vivo human fMRI and EEG databases, suggest that different people have different and stable characteristic λ values, and that λ of different functional systems of the same subject correlate in their values. Moreover, we find here that the λ values of subjects correlate with their brain task performances, in particular for tasks which are known to be affected by changes in neuronal noise or neuronal excitability threshold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.