ArticleScientific reports2025
Nature perception and positive emotions in urban forest parks enhance subjective well-being.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychophysiological restoration in natural versus built cultural environments: a Chinese field-EEG study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Configurational and chain-mediational path-ways linking natural environment perception to restorative environmental perception.PloS one · 2026Article
- Therapist-Guided Versus Self-Guided Forest Immersion: Comparative Efficacy on Short-Term Mental Health and Economic Value.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the acceleration of urbanization around the world, city dwellers face increasing levels of work stress and mental health issues, which negatively impact their subjective well-being. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of natural environment on residents' mental recovery and subjective well-being in urban forest parks, and to analyze the relationship between natural environment perception, mental recovery, restorative environment perception and subjective well-being. Through a questionnaire survey conducted in a botanical garden in Hunan Province, 504 valid samples were collected. Through structural equation model (SEM) analysis, the results show that: (1) natural environment perception has significant positive effects on mental recovery and restorative environment perception. (2) Mental recovery as an intermediary variable significantly improved residents' subjective well-being. In addition, individual demographic characteristics, such as gender, education level, occupation, and frequency of visits, are closely related to the perception and subjective well-being of the natural environment. Among them, the increase of the frequency of visit has a significant positive effect on the improvement of individual's natural environment perception, restorative environment perception, subjective well-being and mental recovery. The results show that: (1) Urban planners should improve the accessibility of urban forest parks and integrate restorative elements into the design. (2) Encourage residents to visit frequently to improve mental recovery and subjective well-being. The results of this study provide empirical support for the value of urban forest parks in promoting public mental recovery and subjective well-being, and provide scientific basis for urban planning and green space management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.