Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40858702›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Exploring the behavioral causal chain in free ranging dogs feeding patterns in Southern Iran.

Alireza Mohammadi, Amir Alambeigi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alireza MohammadiDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran. armohammadi1989@gmail.com.
Amir AlambeigiDepartment of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, University college of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. alambaigi@ut.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing food to Free Ranging Dogs (FRDs) promotes population growth and subsequently harms wildlife through increased predation. In such a situation, the behavior of the local community towards FRDs makes its management doubly difficult. FRDs are a common concern in southern Iran, including Jiroft. However, there is a limited understanding of the community's attitudes towards these animals, creating challenges in implementing effective management practices. This study presents an exploratory investigation aimed at developing a preliminary conceptual model to understand the complex social factors influencing feeding behavior towards FRDs in this region. In such a complex system it is necessary to deal with numerous effects and loops that can influence feeding behavior. Where an emotional bond exists between FRDs and those who feed them. Through a survey of local residents (n = 398) in the city of Jiroft, we explored the social factors that support the feeding of FRDs. The current empirical research has presented the interaction of the variables including previous negative experience, perceived well-being, attitude towards FRDs, emotion and perceived risk in the form of two reinforcing and balancing loops. Overall, the causal model developed showed that feeding behavior of FRDs is rooted in previous experiences, and if this experience is negative, the feeding behavior will stop, and if there is no negative experience, this behavior will continue. Therefore, the main trigger is the previous experience, which is able to build a causal model of the behavioral chain.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalFeeding BehaviorAnimalsDogsFemaleHumansIranMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesFeeding behaviorFree-Ranging dogsHuman-dog conflictsManagementUrban ecosystem

Identifiers

PMID40858702
PMCPMC12381018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.