ArticleScientific reports2025
A cross-cultural study to identify social behaviours of pedestrians in urban public spaces: evidence from Iran, Spain, Italy, and Australia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable walkability around green, blue, and spiritual spaces in a semi-urban district of coastal Karnataka, India.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Urban governance to support adaptable solutions for conversion of residual street spaces into social spaces.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the growing emphasis on social sustainability in urban design, limited research has examined how spatial configurations influence socio-behavioural patterns across culturally distinct urban squares. This study addresses this gap by investigating how the spatial configuration of public squares interacts with pedestrian social behaviours in four cities in Iran, Spain, Italy, and Australia. Guided by theories of space syntax and social behaviour frameworks, a unique mixed-method approach was adopted, combining spatial configuration analysis, behavioural mapping, and people-tracing, coupled with agent-based simulations. The findings revealed that the accessibility of urban squares is not necessarily determinative of their social vibrancy. Rather, stimulating sustained social life in these environments is governed by an intricate nexus of factors, including culturally specific behaviours, the purposeful allocation of functional amenities, and the critical amelioration of socio-economic challenges inherent to their shared public domain. Notably, this cross-cultural analysis highlights how socio-spatial dynamics differ across contexts, offering a richer lens for inclusive design. The originality of this study lies in its multi-scalar, comparative, and culture-sensitive approach to analysing public squares, advancing urban design strategies that are adaptable, equitable, and responsive to both spatial logic and cultural diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.