ArticleScientific reports2025
Rule-adaptive lane-changing trajectory planning method for autonomous vehicles driven by dynamic risk information.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Constraint optimization and key factor analysis based vehicle emergency braking strategy generator.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid advancements in autonomous driving technology have highlighted the challenges of ensuring vehicle safety and driving efficiency in complex dynamic traffic environments. Current approaches typically define potential risks as safety constraints for compliance and use them in trajectory planning. However, the risks predefined in these constraints are often fixed, reducing driving efficiency. To address this limitation, we proposed a dynamic risk-information-driven adaptive trajectory planning method for autonomous vehicles (AVs). This study dynamically adjusted safety constraints using risk assessment results to improve driving efficiency without compromising safety. Firstly, considering the influence of vehicle suspension characteristics on driving safety, collision, and instability risk assessment indices were designed using a three-way-coupled dynamic model to assess driving safety risks. Next, we used the safety risk assessment module to evaluate specific potential risks and adaptively adjusted the safety constraints for constraint-based adaptive trajectory planning. Furthermore, considering trajectory traversal constraints, trajectory selection and optimization were performed on pre-planned trajectories using the cost function to determine the optimal driving trajectory. Lane-changing trajectory planning experiments showed that the method adaptively adjusts safety constraints based on risk assessment results. Under the premise of ensuring driving safety, driving efficiency improved by 55.9% in the preset instability constraint scenario and 27.86% in the preset collision constraint scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.