ArticleScientific reports2025
Psychological safety and trust as drivers of teachers' continued use of AI tools in classrooms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fear vs. temptation: a push-pull-mooring perspective on users' continuance intention toward AI face-swapping technology.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The mechanisms influencing AI teaching readiness among preservice STEM teachers: an empirical analysis based on PLS-SEM and fsQCA.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a flow state scale for healthcare professionals.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite AI tools hold significant potential to enhance English language teaching in primary education, their sustained adoption by teachers remains inconsistent. A key gap in current research is the lack of understanding of how psychological factors influence teachers' long-term usage intentions. This study aims to investigate the impact of psychological safety, trust, anxiety, satisfaction, and expectations on primary English teachers' decisions to adopt and continue using AI tools in classrooms. Specifically, this study examines how psychological safety and trust promote continuance intentions, how anxiety particularly regarding technical failures and privacy concerns hinders adoption, and the role of satisfaction and outcome expectations in reinforcing continuance intentions. Additionally, the moderating effect of perceived risk was explored. Findings suggest that psychological safety and trust significantly enhance long-term AI tool usage, whereas anxiety acts as a major barrier. Teacher satisfaction and positive expectations, especially those tied to student learning outcomes, further strengthen adoption intentions. However, perceived risks can weaken these effects if not properly addressed. The study underscores the need for educational technology developers to prioritize teachers' psychological and emotional concerns by ensuring reliable technical support, transparent privacy policies, and risk-mitigation strategies. By fostering trust and reducing anxiety, schools and policymakers can facilitate more effective AI integration, ultimately improving teaching quality and student outcomes. This research contributes both theoretical insights and practical recommendations for advancing AI adoption in primary education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.