Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40858651›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Preservation of bioactive compounds in mulberry species (Morus spp.) under different drying conditions.

Tuğba Gül Dikme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tuğba Gül DikmeFood Technology Program, Vocational School of Siverek, Harran University, Siverek, 63600, Sanliurfa, Turkey. t.gul@harran.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2212-6443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the changes in the free amino acid profile, mineral content, phenolic compounds, and antioxidant activity of three mulberry species white (Morus alba), red (Morus rubra), and black (Morus nigra) following different drying methods (shade drying, and controlled drying at 55 and 65 °C). The results indicated that drying temperature significantly affected the retention of bioactive compounds. In the amino acid analyses, the highest proline content was recorded in white mulberry dried under shade conditions, reaching 834.80 mg/100 g. The GABA content was found to be 336.17 mg/100 g in red mulberry. In the mineral analyses, calcium content was determined as 4474 mg/kg in white mulberry and 10,660 mg/kg in red mulberry. Regarding phenolic content, shade-dried red mulberry showed the highest level at 10.34 mg GAE/g, followed by black mulberry at 9.69 mg GAE/g and white mulberry at 2.86 mg GAE/g. The highest antioxidant activity was observed in red mulberry, with a value of 47.68%. Overall, the findings suggest that low-temperature drying, particularly shade drying, is the most effective method for preserving the bioactive components of mulberry fruits.

Indexed as

DesiccationMorusAmino AcidsAntioxidantsFruitPhenolsPlant ExtractsAmino AcidsAntioxidantsPhenolsPlant ExtractsAmino acid profileAntioxidant activityDrying temperatureMineral contentMorus spp.Phenolic contentShade drying

Identifiers

PMID40858651
PMCPMC12381166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.