Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40858626›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Dataset of natural conversations about appearance using fNIRS.

Yinying Hu, Yuqi Liu, Yuting Hou, Yafeng Pan, Xiangping Gao

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yinying Hu *School of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China. huyinying@shnu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5459-8728
Yuqi Liu *Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yuting HouSchool of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Yafeng PanDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. yafeng.pan@zju.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5633-8313
Xiangping GaoSchool of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China. gaoxp@shnu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-objectification, marked by an overemphasis on how one's appearance is viewed by others, promotes increased body surveillance and dissatisfaction. Natural conversations centered around appearance, such as "fat talk"-where individuals, often women, engage in negative or self-deprecating remarks about their bodies or weight-are commonly used to induce a state of self-objectification. However, there is a notable lack of public datasets on brain signals during fat talk. In this dataset, we collected brain data from 31 female participants (aged 19.55 ± 0.89 years) using a 40-channel portable near-infrared device during fat talk and non-fat talk (topics such as travel and home decoration), primarily covering the frontal and parietal areas. Data analyses of subjective reports and fNIRS data revealed an increase in body surveillance and dissatisfaction, suggesting a significant activation of the self-objectification state. This dataset can be utilized to explore fNIRS data processing during natural interpersonal conversations and to gain insights into emotional and cognitive responses under conditions of self-dysregulation.

Indexed as

Body ImageBrainAdultFemaleHumansSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40858626
PMCPMC12381086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.