Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40858587›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

High-fidelity geometric quantum gates exceeding 99.9% in germanium quantum dots.

Yu-Chen Zhou, Rong-Long Ma, Zhenzhen Kong, Ao-Ran Li, Chengxian Zhang, Xin Zhang, Yang Liu, Hao-Tian Jiang, Zhi-Tao Wu, Gui-Lei Wang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yu-Chen ZhouKey Laboratory of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Rong-Long MaKey Laboratory of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Zhenzhen KongIntegrated Circuit Advanced Process R&D Center, Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ao-Ran LiKey Laboratory of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Chengxian ZhangSchool of Physical Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Xin ZhangQuTech and Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3780-4769
Yang LiuKey Laboratory of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Hao-Tian JiangKey Laboratory of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Zhi-Tao WuKey Laboratory of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Gui-Lei WangIntegrated Circuit Advanced Process R&D Center, Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. guilei.wang@bjsamt.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1311-8863
Gang CaoKey Laboratory of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3599-5496
Guang-Can GuoKey Laboratory of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Hai-Ou LiKey Laboratory of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China. haiouli@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9898-4735
Guo-Ping GuoKey Laboratory of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China. gpguo@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-9507

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 12034018National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 12474490National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 62404248National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 92165207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving high-fidelity and robust qubit manipulations is a crucial requirement for realizing fault-tolerant quantum computation. Here, we demonstrate a single-hole spin qubit in a germanium quantum dot and characterize its control fidelity using gate set tomography. The maximum control fidelities reach 97.48%, 99.81%, 99.88% for the I, X/2 and Y/2 gate, respectively. These results reveal that off-resonance noise during consecutive I gates in gate set tomography sequences severely limits qubit performance. Therefore, we introduce geometric quantum computation to realize noise-resilient qubit manipulation. The geometric gate control fidelities remain above 99% across a wide range of Rabi frequencies. The maximum fidelity surpasses 99.9%. Furthermore, the fidelities of geometric X/2 and Y/2 (I) gates exceed 99% even when detuning the microwave frequency by  ± 2.5 MHz (± 1.2 MHz), highlighting the noise-resilient feature. These results demonstrate that geometric quantum computation is a potential method for achieving high-fidelity qubit manipulation reproducibly in semiconductor quantum computation.

Identifiers

PMID40858587
PMCPMC12381234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.