ArticleNature communications2025
Experimental confirmation of secondary flows within granular media.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As collections of grains flow, free-surface deformations often develop. These typically suggest the presence of secondary flows, smaller in magnitude than the primary motion but driving complex three-dimensional internal structures. While one can infer such behaviour from boundaries or simulations, we have not previously been able to directly observe secondary flows experimentally. In this paper we present an experimental confirmation of secondary kinematics within granular media using dynamic x-ray radiography, without needing to stop motion for tomography. Specifically, we create a bulldozing mechanism of conveyor-driven grains. This generates a non-uniform, indented free-surface, hinting that secondary mechanisms are at play alongside the primary regime. Discrete element method simulations are shown to be consistent with this secondary-flow explanation. We then probe further experimentally using two perpendicular x-ray source/detector pairs to measure the velocity inside the bulk. This indeed unveils a complex three-dimensional flow pattern that deviates from the primary vertical planes and must include vortices and convection rolls. This advancement is pertinent for industrial and natural scenarios where grains impact obstacles, and has broader relevance for studying the rheology associated with secondary flows in other amorphous materials such as emulsions, pastes and colloids.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.