ArticleBMJ open2025
Safety of early mobilisation in the intensive care unit: a prospective and multicentre cohort study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06653998 (Feasibility and Safety of Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation in Intensive Care Unit Patients. A Prospective, Multicenter Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Feasibility and Safety of Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation in Intensive Care Unit Patients. A Prospective, Multicenter Study
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rehabilitating the diaphragm: an integrated approach to intensive care unit-acquired dysfunction in critical illness-a narrative review.Acute and critical care · 2026Article
- Early mobilization in neurocritical care as a threshold-regulated intervention: a narrative review of mechanistic integration and implications for neurological recovery and physiological stability.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Safety recommendations on laboratory and blood count values for early mobilization in critically ill adults: an expert consensus.Critical care science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) is a common complication in critically ill patients, with an incidence of approximately 50% in the ICU. It is closely associated with increased morbidity, physical deterioration and higher short-term and long-term mortality. Its main characteristics include generalised and symmetrical muscle weakness affecting both respiratory and limb muscles. Early mobilisation has been identified as a feasible intervention in critically ill patients to mitigate the effects of ICU-AW. However, the incidence and nature of potential adverse events associated with its implementation are not yet well established. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the safety outcomes in a cohort of patients undergoing early mobilisation in the ICU. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study that will be conducted between June and December 2025 in four high-complexity ICUs in Bogotá, Colombia. The study will enrol 135 consecutive adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the ICU who meet the eligibility criteria. Recruitment will follow a non-probabilistic, consecutive sampling approach in which all eligible patients will be included as they are admitted.At least 900 early mobilisation sessions are expected. Baseline sociodemographic and clinical data will be collected, and each session will be documented using a standardised form.The primary outcome is the occurrence of adverse events during early mobilisation sessions. These events will be classified as serious or non-serious and assessed by an independent committee to determine causality and preventability.Secondary outcomes include the total number of mobilisation sessions per patient and the highest level of mobility achieved, assessed using the ICU Mobility Scale (IMS).The analysis will include descriptive statistics, incidence of adverse events, session counts and IMS scores. A subgroup analysis will be conducted based on vasopressor use and dosage to explore potential differences in mobility outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Fundación Universitaria Sanitas Research Ethics Committee (CEIFUS 1347-24) Clinical Trials Registration number NCT06653998. The findings will be disseminated in clinical trials study profile, in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06653998.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.