ArticleBMJ open2025
Comparing treatment strategies for placental site trophoblastic tumour (PSTT): study protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPlacental site trophoblastic tumour (PSTT) is a rare type of gestational trophoblastic malignancy. Despite different guidelines recommending surgery, chemotherapy or immunotherapy, there has been no optimal first-line treatment owing to its rarity. Direct comparisons of efficacy and safety across interventions remain limited. We aim to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to explore each PSTT treatment and to help develop individualised, evidence-based clinical decisions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review, registered on PROSPERO and adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-P 2015 guidelines, will evaluate all available treatments for PSTT. Databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science) will be searched from inception to 31 May 2025 using Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords related to PSTT. The inclusion criteria will be studies reporting confirmed PSTT patients and treatment outcomes; the exclusion criteria will be non-human studies, abstracts and reviews. Two researchers will independently screen studies, resolving discrepancies via discussion or a third reviewer. Manual reference checks will complement searches. Data on study characteristics, interventions (chemotherapy, surgery or other treatments) and outcomes (overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, adverse events, fertility) will be extracted. The primary outcome will be the OS. Quality will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies and V.2 Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (RoB 2) for randomised controlled trials. Statistical analyses will be conducted via Review Manager 5.4.1 and Stata 16.0. The ORs, along with 95% CIs will be calculated with random-effects or fixed-effects models depending on the heterogeneity between studies. The sensitivity analyses and publication bias (funnel plots, Begg's/Egger's tests) will be assessed if indicated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this study analyses previously published data, no additional ethical approval is required, nor will patient safety be compromised. The collected results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal following PRISMA-NMA guidelines. No datasets will be generated or analysed during the current study. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251013082.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.