Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40858373›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine effectiveness against anal HPV-16 and HPV-18 infections among young men who have sex with men visiting the sexual health center of Amsterdam (HPV4M): study protocol of an observational study.

Sarah van Veelen, Catharina Alberts, Elske Hoornenborg, Sylvia M Bruisten, Koenraad Vermeij, Fiona van der Klis, Luann Noordpool, Johannes A Bogaards, Maarten Franciscus Schim van der Loeff

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah van VeelenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service (GGD) of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands svveelen@ggd.amsterdam.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0839-9808
Catharina AlbertsDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service (GGD) of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elske HoornenborgDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service (GGD) of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sylvia M BruistenPublic Health Laboratory, Public Health Service (GGD) of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4897-4261
Koenraad VermeijSoa Aids Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fiona van der KlisLaboratory for Immunology, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Luann NoordpoolDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service (GGD) of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes A BogaardsAmsterdam Institute for Immunology & Infectious Diseases (AII), Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-5141
Maarten Franciscus Schim van der LoeffDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service (GGD) of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMen who have sex with men (MSM) are at increased risk for human papillomavirus (HPV)-related anal cancer and may benefit from targeted vaccination campaigns, but it is unclear whether vaccination of sexually active MSM still prevents anal HPV infections. Protocolised data on vaccine effectiveness (VE) in routine vaccination programmes targeting MSM are limited. We describe a protocol to evaluate the VE against anal HPV-16/18 infections in young MSM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This observational study compares HPV-16/18 infection prevalence between vaccinated and unvaccinated MSM of the same age. We recruit MSM at the Sexual Health Center of Amsterdam, born in 1996-2003, who receive bivalent HPV vaccination (Cervarix) (group 1). Participants complete a questionnaire on demographics and sexual behaviour and provide anal, penile, oral gargle and venous blood samples at months 0 and 24. Adverse events are monitored by a questionnaire 2 weeks post vaccine. Recruitment of group 2, also MSM born in 1996-2003, but not vaccinated against HPV, will start 24 months after recruitment of group 1. The same samples are collected, and the same questionnaire is administered. Anal samples are tested for HPV DNA and, if positive, typed for 25 HPV genotypes including HPV-16/18; serum samples are tested for HPV-16/18 antibodies; other samples are stored for future analyses. Type-specific VE will be estimated as 1-OR, where OR refers to the OR of DNA positivity in group 1 at month 24 versus DNA positivity of group 2 for the respective vaccine types. Recruitment of group 1 started in February 2023 and was completed in June 2024. From February 2025 onwards, group 1 will return for the 24-month visit and recruitment of group 2 will start. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the medical ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Center. This protocol presents minimal risk to participants. Findings will be presented to stakeholders in immunisation policy and be disseminated through scientific journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION SYSTEM 2022-502224-49-00.

Indexed as

Homosexuality, MaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesVaccine EfficacyAdolescentAdultAnal CanalAnus NeoplasmsHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMaleNetherlandsObservational Studies as TopicSexual and Gender MinoritiesPapillomavirus VaccinesAnus NeoplasmsHPV InfectionHPV VaccineHuman Papillomavirus VirusesPublic healthSexual and Gender Minorities

Identifiers

PMID40858373
PMCPMC12410653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.