ArticleBMJ open2025
Evaluating HIV testing preferences and uptake of oral fluid-based HIV self-testing among men who have sex with men and transgender women in the Greater Manila Area of the Philippines: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods research protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRapid antibody testing is a cornerstone in HIV case finding and management. Without tools for rapid detection and diagnosis of HIV infection, none of the downstream targets for linkage to antiretroviral therapy and viral suppression in the HIV treatment cascade could be achieved. In the Philippines, oral HIV self-testing (HIVST) has not been adapted for use. Moreover, no study has been conducted to determine HIV testing preferences and acceptability of oral HIVST among Filipino men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW). The protocol describes a mixed-method approach to evaluate HIV testing preferences and acceptability of oral HIVST vs currently available testing modalities among MSM and TGW in the Greater Manila Area and determine the factors underlying the participants' selection of a testing modality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will use an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. The initial phase will involve a cross-sectional survey with a pre/post questionnaire format design targeting 480 MSM and 478 TGW. A case study phase follows, with 80 in-depth interviews to provide more detailed qualitative insights. Quantitative data will be analysed using multinomial logistic regression models, while qualitative data will be examined using an inductive approach through thematic analysis. A narrative approach will synthesise the quantitative and qualitative findings for a unified interpretation and comprehensive understanding of the results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the University of the Philippines Manila Research Ethics Board (UPMREB 2023-0579-01). The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications and academic presentations at conferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.