Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40858364›Full record

ReviewActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025

Sex-Dependent Differences in Colonoscopy Sedation: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Niels Brink Mylin, Veronica Ott, Ann Merete Møller, Birgitte Brandstrup

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Niels Brink MylinDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Veronica OttDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ann Merete MøllerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Birgitte BrandstrupDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

The research going into the scoping review is supported by the Department of Surgery, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk Sygehus
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis scoping review aims to map evidence on sex differences in colonoscopy sedation use and their impact on colonoscopy quality indicators (CQIs).

methodsThe review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The search will be conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Only original studies investigating sex-based differences in the use of sedation during colonoscopy and their influence on CQIs will be included. Data will be charted based on trial characteristics, demographic data, population size, sedation type, investigated gender-dependent outcomes, and presented level of evidence.

resultsA structured overview will be presented as a narrative summary with supplementary statistics.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyProcedural SedationSex CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMaleResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicSex FactorscolonoscopyCQIs (caecal intubation rate etc.)sedationsex/gender

Identifiers

PMID40858364
PMCPMC12380525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.