ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2025
Performance against quality indicators in the initial assessment of patients with respiratory infections in acute medicine services.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHospital attendances due to respiratory infection peak in winter, contributing to pressures within acute services. We assessed the prevalence of suspected respiratory infection within acute medical admissions during winter and evaluated performance against recommendations for initial assessment.
methodsData were collected through the Society for Acute Medicine (SAM) Benchmarking Audit, comprising a hospital-level survey and 24-hour patient-level data collection for unplanned acute medical attendances on 22 February 2024. Performance metrics assessed included those from the SAM's clinical quality indicators (CQI) for medical admissions, and British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines for community acquired pneumonia.
resultsData were available for 4390 patients at 76 hospitals. Suspected respiratory infections accounted for 22.8% of all unplanned medical attendances; these patients were older (age ≥70 years: 58.2% vs 44.7%, p<0.001) and had higher National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) scores (NEWS2 ≥3: 63.8% vs 23.8%, p<0.001) than those without respiratory infection; they were more likely to be assessed in the emergency department (80.8% vs 63.7%, p<0.001), and had lower rates of discharge without overnight admission (14.9% vs 35.9%, p<0.001). 71.0% of patients underwent a chest X-ray within 4 hours of arrival; 27.0% were reported within 12 hours. Antibiotics were administered ≥4 hours from arrival in 32.9%. Performance against these indicators varied between hospitals. Nine hospitals (12.7%) had a separate respiratory admission service; this was not associated with improved performance against SAM CQIs or BTS guidance.
conclusionRespiratory infections contribute significantly to acute medical attendances via the emergency department. There remains significant scope to improve key steps in initial assessment and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.