Observational studyOpen heart2025
Association analysis of blood pressure with incident risks for thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms: an observational study of the UK Biobank cohort.
Observational study in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm progression: A review of preclinical and clinical data.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Review
- Pathogenetic Gut Microbiota in Aortic Diseases: Evidence and Mechanisms Across Aneurysm, Dissection, and Inflammatory Aortopathies.Nutrients · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe specific relationship between different blood pressure measures and the risk of aortic aneurysms (AA) remains unclear. Elucidating these associations would be conducive to identifying high-risk individuals and developing more effective screening strategies, potentially reducing AA incidence. This study aimed to investigate the association between various blood pressure measures or subtypes of hypertension and the risk of AA.
methodsUsing data from the UK biobank study, we performed multivariable Cox regression analysis to estimate HRs for baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse pressure (PP) with risk of AA. The associations of isolated systolic hypertension, isolated diastolic and combined systolic-diastolic hypertension for AA were also assessed.
resultsOur analysis included 397 019 participants without antihypertensive medication at baseline (mean age, 55.4 (SD 8.1) years; 56.6% female). We identified 1782 cases of AA during a median follow-up period of 12 years. The association between SBP and AA was weak (per-SD HR=1.03, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.08). The association between DBP and AA (per-SD HR=1.24, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.33) was significant when DBP reached 80 mm Hg and higher. Lower PP was linearly associated with increasing AA risk (per-SD HR=0.76, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.83). These patterns were consistent when comparing abdominal AA with overall cases. Compared with the normal group, the HRs of isolated systolic hypertension, isolated diastolic hypertension and combined hypertension on AA were 1.01 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.13), 1.67 (95% CI 1.27 to 2.18) and 1.35 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.52), respectively.
conclusionsElevated DBP and reduced PP, but not SBP, were independently associated with a higher risk of incident AA, highlighting their potential to refine clinical risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.