Observational studyOpen heart2025
Adverse cardiovascular events in coronary Plaques not undeRgoing pErcutaneous coronary intervention evaluateD with optIcal Coherence Tomography. The PREDICT-AI risk model.
Observational study in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Electrocardiography to the Catheterization Laboratory: A Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Framework for Acute Coronary Syndrome Detection and Risk Stratification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Moving Beyond Angiography: Integrating Physiology and Plaque Vulnerability, a Step Forward in Precision Medicine.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- Plaques Do Not Act Alone: Time to Redefine Coronary Vulnerability from Lesion to Phenotype.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMost acute coronary syndromes (ACS) originate from coronary plaques that are angiographically mild and not flow limiting. These lesions, often characterised by thin-cap fibroatheroma, large lipid cores and macrophage infiltration, are termed 'vulnerable plaques' and are associated with a heightened risk of future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). However, current imaging modalities lack robust predictive power, and treatment strategies for such plaques remain controversial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PREDICT-AI study aims to develop and externally validate a machine learning (ML)-based risk score that integrates optical coherence tomography (OCT) plaque features and patient-level clinical data to predict the natural history of non-flow-limiting coronary lesions not treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This is a multicentre, prospective, observational study enrolling 500 patients with recent ACS who undergo comprehensive three-vessel OCT imaging. Lesions not treated with PCI will be characterised using artificial intelligence (AI)-based plaque analysis (OctPlus software), including quantification of fibrous cap thickness, lipid arc, macrophage presence and other microstructural features. A three-step ML pipeline will be used to derive and validate a risk score predicting MACE at follow-up. Outcomes will be adjudicated blinded to OCT findings. The primary endpoint is MACE (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularisation or target vessel revascularisation). Event prediction will be assessed at both the patient level and plaque level. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The PREDICT-AI study will generate a clinically applicable, AI-driven risk stratification tool based on high-resolution intracoronary imaging. By identifying high-risk, non-obstructive coronary plaques, this model may enhance personalised management strategies and support the transition towards precision medicine in coronary artery disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.