Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40858346›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2025

A one-stop clinic improvement project for postmenopausal bleeding in NHS Forth Valley.

Andrew Robinson, Donald Wilson, Dawn Mahal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew RobinsonImproving Access Portfolio, Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Edinburgh, UK andrew.robinson2@nhs.scot.ORCID 0009-0009-0259-3667
Donald WilsonObstetrics and Gynaecology, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, Falkirk, UK.
Dawn MahalEvidence and Evaluation for Improvement, Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReferrals for postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) were creating a pressure point within a general gynaecology outpatient clinic in NHS Forth Valley (NHSFV) in Scotland. This project originated in concerns around delays in time from referral to diagnosis as a result of this pressure point.

aimThe aim of this project was to test the efficiency of a process change which reduced waiting time from referral to diagnosis for patients with PMB.

methodsUse Active Clinical Referral Triage (ACRT) and a one-stop clinic to reduce waiting lists. Quality improvement methods including data collection and process mapping were used to understand the current system. Cycles of the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) tool were applied to test the concept of introducing a one-stop clinic for PMB.

resultsQualitative data gathered during the project showed that patients preferred the one-stop clinic. Limited quantitative data indicated the one-stop clinic design reduced PMB referral waiting time for patients.

conclusionOur aim was to streamline a process to reduce waiting time between referral and diagnosis for patients with PMB. This was achieved by the creation of a one-stop clinic for PMB/unscheduled bleeding on HRT (hormone replacement therapy) patients. The work to date has highlighted the efficiency of the new process and ultimately suggests the potential for a reduction in waiting times in this pathway.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesPostmenopauseUterine HemorrhageAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementReferral and ConsultationScotlandState MedicineTime FactorsWaiting ListsObstetrics and gynecologyQuality improvementQuality improvement methodologiesWaiting ListsWomen's health

Identifiers

PMID40858346
PMCPMC12382502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.