Observational studyBMJ open2025
Industry payments to US neurologists related to multiple sclerosis drugs and prescribing (2015-2019): a retrospective cohort study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo measure the prevalence and magnitude of industry payments to neurologists prescribing multiple sclerosis (MS) drugs and determine whether payments are associated with prescribing.
designRetrospective observational study.
settingData on neurologists prescribing MS drugs from 2015 to 2019 in the Medicare Part D database linked to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments database.
participants7401 neurologists prescribing MS drugs from 2015 to 2019 to Medicare beneficiaries.
main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the proportion of physicians' annual prescriptions manufactured by a given company. Generalised linear mixed models were used to evaluate associations between the presence and magnitude of payments and prescribing. The association between prescription volume and the likelihood of receiving payments as well as the value of payments was also assessed.
resultsAmong 7401 neurologists, 5809 (78.5%) received payments totalling US$163.6 million between 2015 and 2019. While the median amount per physician was US$779 (IQR, US$188-US$2587), US$155.7 million (95.2%) accrued to the top 10% of payment recipients. Higher prescription volumes were associated with a higher likelihood of receiving any payment type, particularly for consulting services, non-consulting services and travel/lodging (p<0.001). Among payment recipients, the amount received was positively associated with prescription volume (p<0.001). Receipt of payments was associated with greater likelihood of prescribing the company's drugs compared with those who received no payments from that company (OR 1.13 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.15)), with the largest association for non-consulting services, such as being a speaker at an event (OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.44 to 1.62)). Larger payments were associated with a greater likelihood of prescribing (OR 1.10, 1.26, 1.29 and 1.50 for US$50, US$500, US$1000 and US$5000, respectively), as were longer durations of payments (OR 1.12 for single year to 1.78 for 5 consecutive years) and more recent payments (OR 1.03 for payments made 4 years prior to 1.34 for payments made in the same year).
conclusionsNearly 80% of neurologists prescribing MS drugs received at least one industry payment, with higher volume prescribers being more likely to receive payments. Physicians receiving payments were more likely to prescribe the company's drugs, with a stronger association for payments that were larger, sustained and recent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.