Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40858318›Full record

ArticleAsian spine journal2025

Efficacy of gabapentin and pregabalin for the treatment of neurogenic claudication in lumbar spinal stenosis: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Chatupon Chotigavanichaya, Korawish Mekariya, Borriwat Santipas, Sirichai Wilartratsami, Ekkapoj Korwutthikulrangsri, Monchai Ruangchainikom, Panya Luksanapruksa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian spine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chatupon ChotigavanichayaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Korawish MekariyaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Borriwat SantipasDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sirichai WilartratsamiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ekkapoj KorwutthikulrangsriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Monchai RuangchainikomDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Panya LuksanapruksaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University (IO) R016033010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designA double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin (GBA) and pregabalin (PGB) versus placebo in managing neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC), functional outcomes, and quality of life in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: GBA and PGB are frequently prescribed for NIC associated with LSS. However, evidence supporting their efficacy, either in comparison with placebo or in direct comparison between the two gabapentinoids in LSS, remains limited.

methodsLSS patients with predominant NIC symptoms for ≥3 months were randomized (1:1:1) to receive GBA (1,800 mg/day), PGB (300 mg/day), or placebo in addition to standard conservative management, including physical therapy and naproxen. GBA and PGB were both titrated to the effective dose over 14 days. The primary outcome was NIC pain measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score (SSS), self-paced shuttle walk test (SPSWT; time to NIC symptoms and walking distance), Euro-QoL Group's 5-Dimension, 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), and adverse effects. All outcomes were assessed monthly over 4 months.

resultsNinety patients (mean age, 63.14 years; symptoms duration, 19.38 months) were included. All groups demonstrated significant improvements in VAS, SSS, SPSWT, and EQ-5D-5L at 4 months. At 1 and 2 months, PGB showed greater EQ-5D-5L improvement compared to GBA (mean differences: 0.07 [p=0.045] and 0.08 [p=0.001], respectively). No significant differences in other outcomes were observed between groups at any time point. Adverse effects, including dizziness and sedation, were more common in the GBA and PGB groups compared to placebo (p<0.001).

conclusionsGBA and PGB did not demonstrate superior efficacy over placebo in reducing NIC and improving functional outcomes in LSS. Moreover, their use was associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects. These findings suggest limited utility for gabapentinoids as adjunctive treatments for LSS.

Indexed as

GabapentinIntermittent claudicationPregabalinRandomized controlled trialSpinal stenosis

Identifiers

PMID40858318
PMCPMC12765924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.