ArticleAsian spine journal2025
Augmented reality-guided pedicle screw fixation: an experimental study.
Article in Asian spine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmented Reality Navigation for Pedicle Screw Fixation: Technical Accuracy and Feasibility in a Human Cadaveric Study.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2026Article
- Global analysis and prospects of assisted pedicle screw placement surgery: a bibliometric study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Augmented reality in non-instrumentation minimally invasive spine surgery: a narrative review and future perspectives.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Review
- Letter to editor: Augmented reality-guided pedicle screw fixation.Asian spine journal · 2025Article
- Response to the letter to the editor: Augmented reality-guided pedicle screw fixation: an experimental study.Asian spine journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
designCadaveric experimental study. PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of pedicle screw placement using a custom-developed augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw fixation (ARPSF) system in a porcine spine model. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Conventional pedicle screw placement techniques face limitations including potential inaccuracy, radiation exposure, and workflow disruption. Augmented reality technology can overlay virtual surgical planning directly onto the operative field while maintaining the surgeon's focus on the patient.
methodsFive porcine cadaveric lumbar spines were used in this study. A custom-developed head-mounted display system with optical tracking projected three-dimensional reconstructed spine models and planned screw trajectories into the surgeon's field of view. A single experienced spine surgeon placed 50 pedicle screws (4.5 mm diameter). Registration was performed using a point-pair matching technique with fifteen anatomical landmarks. Accuracy was assessed via postoperative computed tomography scan, measuring entry point deviation, trajectory deviation, and angular difference, and evaluated using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification.
resultsOf the 50 pedicle screws placed, 47 (94%) achieved grade A accuracy with complete containment within the pedicle. The remaining three screws (6%) were classified as grade B, with minor breaches less than 2 mm. No unsafe placements (grades C-E) occurred. The mean entry point deviation was 0.55 mm (standard deviation [SD]=0.33 mm), and the mean deviation at the screw tip was 0.71 mm (SD=0.32 mm). The mean axial angular deviation was 2.04° (SD=0.58°). The average placement time was 2.2 minutes per screw.
conclusionsThe custom-developed ARPSF system demonstrated high accuracy for pedicle screw placement in a porcine model, achieving submillimeter precision and minimal angular deviation. This experimental study shows the potential of augmented reality technology to enhance spine instrumentation precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.