ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Nutrient niche dynamics among wild pollinators.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA metabarcoding reveals key floral resources for native pollinators in post-fire landscapes.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Article
- Wild bees occupy temporally stable pollen nutritional niches.Oecologia · 2026Article
- Nutrient niche dynamics among wild pollinators.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Food underpins fitness and ecological interactions, yet how nutrient availability shapes species interactions in natural communities remains poorly understood. Most nutritional ecology research focuses on laboratory or single-species systems, limiting insight into how nutrient use and nutrient niche dynamics occur in complex, multispecies assemblages in the wild. We combined long-term plant-pollinator interaction data with pollen macronutrient analyses to examine how wild bumble bees exploit macronutrients and whether they occupy distinct nutrient niches. Pollen macronutrient composition varied across plant species and over the season, with protein-rich pollen peaking in spring and lipid- and carbohydrate-rich pollen increasing by late summer. Across this nutrient landscape, bumble bee species occupied two distinct macronutrient niches: one high in protein and low in lipid and carbohydrate, and the other lower in protein but moderate in lipid and carbohydrate. Nutrient niche partitioning was associated with differences in feeding morphology and colony life stage (but not phenology). We found little evidence that nutrient niche breadth differed among species or was explained by feeding morphology or colony life stage. Our results extend nutritional ecology to a multispecies context, provide evidence for nutrient niche partitioning among wild pollinators and highlight the need to consider species-specific nutritional requirements in pollinator conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.