ArticleCell reports methods2025
Ultrastructural analysis of synapses after induction of spike-timing-dependent plasticity.
Article in Cell reports methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Neuronal Network Connectivity Through Precise and Scalable Electrical Modulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- RAEM: random-access electron microscopy for revisitable 3D imaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repeated sequential activation of connected neurons causes lasting changes in synaptic strength, a process known as spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). Recently, sequential spike patterns have been induced without electrodes, using two spectrally separated channelrhodopsins. However, due to the difficulty of labeling and localizing the few connecting synapses between the stimulated pre- and postsynaptic neurons (∼1-5 per neuron pair), ultrastructural analysis after STDP has not been reported. Here, we optogenetically induce STDP at CA3-CA1 hippocampal synapses and identify stimulated boutons and spines in CA1 using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Presynaptic CA3 neurons express vesicle-targeted horseradish peroxidase, cre recombinase, and cre-dependent ChrimsonR, a red light-activatable channelrhodopsin. Postsynaptic neurons express violet light-activatable CheRiff and dAPEX2, an enhanced ascorbate peroxidase. In TEM, presynaptic boutons and postsynaptic spines are readily identifiable with well-preserved ultrastructural features. Our labeling strategy allows ultrastructural analysis of optogenetically manipulated neurons and their synapses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.