ArticlePsychoneuroendocrinology2025
Social buffering by siblings in childhood and adolescence.
Article in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although positive sibling relationships are associated with better developmental outcomes for children and adolescents, it is unknown whether siblings may be effective social buffers of physiological stress. In addition, there is little research on whether depressive symptoms may moderate the effectiveness of social buffering. The current study examined (1) whether siblings, compared to strangers, buffered the cortisol response to a social evaluative stressor in children and adolescents, (2) whether depressive symptoms moderated this effect, and (3) whether self-reported sibling relationship quality influenced sibling buffering effectiveness. A total of 72 children (9-11 years) and 65 adolescents (15-17 years) were randomly assigned to complete the Trier Social Stress Test-Online with a same-age or older sibling versus a stranger. Participants provided saliva samples to measure cortisol reactivity and recovery across the session and reported on their depressive symptoms and sibling relationship quality. The sibling versus stranger buffering effect varied based on participants' developmental stage (child vs. adolescent) and level of depressive symptoms. Specifically, adolescents with high depressive symptoms who prepared with a sibling showed lower cortisol reactivity than those who prepared with a stranger (b = 0.70, SE = 0.32, p < .05). In contrast, there were no significant differences by condition for children or adolescents with low depressive symptoms. For individuals who prepared with a sibling (n = 69), higher alienation predicted impaired cortisol recovery post-stressor (b = 0.32, SE = 0.18, p < .05). These findings are in line with research on normative development of sibling relationships and cortisol activity in the context of depression from childhood to adolescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.