ArticleJMIR formative research2025
A Novel Approach to Care Redesign Collaboration Between Emergency and Specialty Departments: Qualitative Experience Report.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Given the rising demand for emergency department (ED) services and coupled with the scarcity of specialty care availability, there is an urgency to design a system for appropriate, effective, and timely ED-to-specialty ambulatory referrals. Efficient care transitions are important to patient outcomes and experience and require cross-specialty cooperation, as care transitions affect practices and resources of individuals, departments, and institutions. Objective: Here, our objective was to (1) describe a collaboration between Stanford's Emergency Medicine and Neurology and Neurological Sciences departments aimed at designing and implementing an optimized discharge process and transition of care from ED to ambulatory neurology for follow-up care and (2) the resulting intervention from the collaboration. Methods: We describe the process for barrier identification, tools used to foster partnership and intervention ideation, and the resulting intervention. Our experience and findings are integrated into a 4-component framework for future interdepartmental collaborations: (1) cross-specialty team meetings, (2) preimplementation interviews, (3) a design thinking focus group session, and (4) small group meetings. Qualitative data included observational notes and document review from biweekly cross-specialty and small group meetings, preimplementation interviews, and design-thinking focus groups. Results: Our process included 10 cross-specialty team meetings with 8 physicians and operational representatives, 18 individual preimplementation interviews, 10 focus group participants, and 9 small group meetings. The process components fostered collaboration and teamwork among the multidisciplinary team; supported early identification of barriers and facilitators, including divergent understanding of project goals; and developed creative ideas that contributed to intervention development. The collaboration resulted in a 4-pronged multimodal intervention. Two elements focused on modifying clinical practice to better triage clinically appropriate ED referrals to ambulatory neurology: (1) optimizing management of conditions in the ED to reduce preventable referrals, and (2) increasing deferral to Primary Care clinicians to direct appropriate specialty follow-up care. Two additional structural elements sought to directly improve appropriate referral timeliness by (3) streamlining insurance authorization processes and (4) increasing neurology appointment availability. Conclusions: This cross-specialty collaboration resulted in a multimodal intervention that called for both structural and practice changes, which were novel and supported by the results of comparable interventions. Future applications of this framework can validate its utility among different collaborative groups in new settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.