Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40857675›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025

An Extraction Tool for Venous Thromboembolism Symptom Identification in Primary Care Notes to Facilitate Electronic Clinical Quality Measure Reporting: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

John Novoa-Laurentiev, Mica Bowen, Avery Pullman, Wenyu Song, Ania Syrowatka, Jin Chen, Michael Sainlaire, Frank Chang, Krissy Gray, Purushottam Panta and 6 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

John Novoa-LaurentievDepartment of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 8572824088.ORCID 0000-0001-9418-424X
Mica BowenDepartment of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 8572824088.ORCID 0000-0001-9646-2856
Avery PullmanDepartment of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 8572824088.ORCID 0000-0003-0649-4948
Wenyu SongDepartment of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 8572824088.ORCID 0000-0001-6146-4093
Ania SyrowatkaDepartment of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 8572824088.ORCID 0000-0002-7161-9770
Jin ChenDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6721-3199
Michael SainlaireDepartment of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 8572824088.
Frank ChangDepartment of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 8572824088.ORCID 0000-0003-1774-9926
Krissy GrayDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8998-1241
Purushottam PantaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-9699-4274
Luwei LiuDepartment of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 8572824088.ORCID 0000-0003-3514-0970
Khalid NawabDepartment of Information Services, Penn State Health, Hershey, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1824-413X
Shadi HijjawiDepartment of Information Services, Penn State Health, Hershey, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6471-5633
Richard SchreiberDepartment of Information Services, Penn State Health, Hershey, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6138-7048
Li ZhouDepartment of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 8572824088.ORCID 0000-0003-3874-4833
Patricia C DykesDepartment of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 8572824088.ORCID 0000-0003-4597-0732

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is often delayed, and facilitating earlier diagnosis may improve associated morbidity and mortality. Clinical notes contain information not found elsewhere in the medical record that could facilitate timely VTE diagnosis and accurate quality measurement. However, extracting relevant information from unstructured clinical notes is complex. Today, there are relatively few electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) in our national payment program and none that use natural language processing (NLP) techniques for data extraction. NLP holds great promise for making quality measurement more accurate and more efficient. Given the potential of NLP-based applications to facilitate more accurate VTE detection, primary care is one clinical setting in urgent need of this type of tool. Objective: This study aimed to develop a tool that extracts VTE symptoms from clinical notes for use within an eCQM to quantify the rate of delayed diagnosis of VTE in primary care settings. Methods: We iteratively developed an NLP-based data extraction tool, venous thromboembolism symptom extractor (VTExt), on an internal dataset using a rule-based approach to extract VTE symptoms from primary care clinical note text. The VTE symptoms lexicon was derived and optimized with physician guidance and externally validated using datasets from 2 independent health care organizations. We performed 26 rounds of performance evaluation of notes sampled from the case cohort (17,585 patient progress note sentences from 279 patient notes), and 5 rounds of evaluation of the control cohort (2838 patient progress note sentences from 50 patient notes). VTExt's performance was evaluated using evaluation metrics, including area under the curve, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: VTExt achieved near-perfect performance in extracting VTE symptoms from primary care notes sampled from records of patients diagnosed with or without VTE. In external validation, VTExt achieved promising performance in 2 additional geographically distant organizations using different electronic health record systems. When compared against a deep learning model and 4 machine learning models, VTExt exhibited similar or even improved performance across all metrics. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a data-driven NLP-based approach to clinical note information extraction that can be generalized to different electronic health record systems across different institutions. Due to the robust performance of this tool, VTExt is the first NLP application to be used in a nationally endorsed eCQM.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingPrimary Health CareQuality Indicators, Health CareVenous ThromboembolismFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAIalgorithm developmentalgorithm validationartificial intelligenceclinical noteclinical qualitydiagnosiselectronic clinical quality measureextractionextraction toolnatural language processingNLPprimary carethromboembolismtimely diagnosistoolvenous thromboembolismVTE

Identifiers

PMID40857675
PMCPMC12387394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.