ReviewBlood2026
Novel strategies targeting mutant calreticulin in essential thrombocythemia and myelofibrosis.
Review in Blood, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The German ONKOPEDIA Guideline for Myelofibrosis in 2025-Recommendations of an MPN Expert Panel of the German Society for Hematology and Oncology (DGHO).International journal of cancer · 2026Guideline
- Molecular Response, Event-Free Survival, and Treatment-Free Remission in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Update and Review with Insights from MPN Asia 2026.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractThe discovery of calreticulin (CALR) mutations in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) has paved the way for the elucidation of a unique disease mechanism that is particularly well suited to targeting by biologics. All MPN-associated pathogenic CALR mutations are characterized by a frameshift, resulting in translation of the same neoantigen peptide. This neoantigen directly activates the thrombopoietin receptor, leading to uncontrolled neoplastic cell proliferation. Current therapeutic approaches for MPNs are focused primarily on blood count control. Furthermore, current approaches are neither disease modifying nor clonally selective. However, because the mutant CALR neoantigen peptide is functional and not expressed in normal physiology, it is an ideal drug target. Here, we review the structure and function of mutant CALR, including the subtle yet clinically and therapeutically relevant differences between the 2 most commonly occurring types of mutation. We also review the current therapeutic landscape for CALR-mutated MPNs, highlighting the areas in which current approaches are inadequate. Finally, we review ongoing clinical and preclinical experimental approaches for targeting mutant CALR in MPNs in a clonally selective manner using monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, cancer vaccination, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and antibody-drug conjugates. Taken together, we expect that ongoing developments in mutant CALR-targeted therapeutics will lead to promising novel strategies for long-term disease control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.