ArticleBlood2025
A prime editing strategy to rewrite the γ-globin promoters and reactivate fetal hemoglobin for sickle cell disease.
Article in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms underlying disease-causing variants in promoters and enhancers.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Enhanced γ-globin reactivation and sickle cell correction through a repressor-to-activator motif switch in theMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Review
- Gene Therapy of Beta Hemoglobinopathies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractFetal hemoglobin reactivation is a promising therapy for β-hemoglobinopathies. We developed a prime editing strategy that introduces multiple mutations in the fetal γ-globin promoters that are expected to increase their activity. We tested multiple targets and optimized a variety of parameters to achieve ∼50% of precise edits in a hematopoietic cell line, with minimal off-target effects. This work improved our understanding of the complex DNA repair mechanisms involved in prime editing. We tested this strategy in patients' hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Although editing efficiency was variable among donors, erythroid clones carrying multiple mutations expressed a significantly higher γ-globin level than cells carrying individual mutations, confirming the potential therapeutic benefit of our combined strategy for patients with β-hemoglobinopathies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.