Trial reportMilitary medicine2026
Rapid Reduction in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Severity after Three Fascial Counterstrain Manual Treatments: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Trial report in Military medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPosttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with hyperactivity of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and elevated levels of central and peripheral pro-inflammatory biomarkers. Fascial Counterstrain (FCS) is a manual therapy technique purported to reduce inflammation and neuroexcitation by decreasing the concentration of pro-inflammatory mediators in the interstitial tissues. We hypothesized that a short course of FCS treatment that specifically targets the interstitium surrounding the SNS will result in a decrease in the severity of PTSD symptoms. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-four consenting volunteers with a baseline Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) score ≥ 11 were randomized to either an FCS treatment group (n = 13) or waitlist control group (n = 11) after obtaining informed consent as approved by Solutions IRB. Changes in PTSD symptom severity were assessed after three 1.5-hour FCS treatments in 11 subjects in the treatment group and compared to 11 waitlist controls using a piecewise linear mixed-effects regression model. Changes in self-reported depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms, life satisfaction, and subjective measure of overall improvement were also assessed.
resultsThree 1.5-hour FCS treatments administered over an average duration of 19.5 days [95% CI (15.2-23.8)] resulted in a significantly greater reduction in PTSD symptom severity in the FCS treatment group compared to the waitlist control group [CAPS-5 scores: 18.7-point decrease, 95% CI (8.7-28.7) vs. 1.3-point decrease, 95% CI (0.7-1.9); main effect for FCS treatment: P < .001; FCS group vs. control group comparison: P = .0017]. Compared to waitlist controls, the FCS treatment group also had statistically significant decreases in self-reported depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms in addition to increases in self-reported overall improvement and life satisfaction.
conclusionThis proof-of-concept study is the first to demonstrate that a short course of FCS manual therapy targeting the SNS resulted in a rapid and statistically significant reduction in clinician-rated PTSD symptom severity, as well as patient-reported depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms. Large, randomized studies in PTSD should compare the effectiveness of FCS manual therapy to evidence-based psychotherapies or pharmacotherapies to evaluate its potential as a rapid, cost-effective, and scalable public health intervention. CLINICAL
trial registrationIRB Registration # IORG0007116.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.