ReviewArchives of endocrinology and metabolism2025
Should iodine supplementation be universally recommended for pregnant women in Brazil? A position statement from the Thyroid Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM).
Review in Archives of endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA U-shaped relationship exists between maternal urinary iodine concentration (UIC) and the risk of thyroid dysfunction, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and neurological deficits in offspring. Both iodine deficiency and excess should be avoided during pregnancy. The WHO recommends increased iodine intake during pregnancy due to elevated thyroid hormone production and fetal iodine transfer. In countries with universal salt iodization, additional supplementation is generally not advised, although iodization alone may be insufficient. In Brazil, salt iodization has reduced iodine deficiency disorders, but in 2013, regulatory agencies lowered iodine levels in salt due to high population-wide salt intake. Without national surveys, it remains unclear whether current iodine levels in table salt are sufficient for pregnant women. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe clinical questions addressed in this document were derived from stakeholder feedback and input from panel members. The group synthesized the available knowledge on this topic by conducting electronic database searches, reviewing and selecting relevant citations, and critically appraising selected studies.
resultsThe group recommends exclusive use of regulated iodized salt during pregnancy. Iodine supplementation should be individualized for at-risk pregnant women, including those with chronic gastrointestinal disorders, restricted diets, or malabsorption conditions. Excess iodine intake should be avoided. In alignment with public policies under PNAISAL, health education on appropriate salt use and storage should be reinforced in primary care. Urinary iodine tests should be used for population-level assessment only.
conclusionThese recommendations aim to support clinical decision-making regarding iodine supplementation during pregnancy in Brazil, thereby improving maternal and fetal health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.