Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40857622›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2025

A "Pandemic-Proof" Methodology for Outbreak Detection Adapted From COVID-19's Impact on Notifications of Infectious Diseases in the Netherlands: Surveillance Study.

Babette van Deursen, Stijn Raven, Wolfer van den Bosch, Cornelia H M van Jaarsveld, Aura Timen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Babette van DeursenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 21, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands, +31622989091.ORCID 0000-0002-7643-7888
Stijn RavenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 21, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands, +31622989091.ORCID 0000-0003-3471-0329
Wolfer van den BoschDepartment of Infectious Disease Control, Public Health Service region Utrecht, Zeist, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-9565-0893
Cornelia H M van JaarsveldDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 21, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands, +31622989091.ORCID 0000-0002-4269-0041
Aura TimenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 21, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands, +31622989091.ORCID 0000-0002-5793-5443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reporting of notifiable infectious diseases was overall impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This could affect disease surveillance and thus, outbreak detection, as it is based on historical data. For effective outbreak detection, it is crucial that communicable disease control professionals can rely on accurate and valuable alarm thresholds to ensure timely and adequate response to potential outbreaks. Objective: In this study, we take the first steps in the development of a methodology that adjusts for the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of notifications of notifiable infectious diseases and provides corrected alarm thresholds for outbreak detection. We identify which infectious diseases were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, assess the duration of these effects, and explore potential correction methods to improve outbreak detection. Methods: We analyzed cases of 25 notifiable infectious diseases reported from 2015-2023 in the Netherlands. Negative binomial regression was used to calculate the incidence rate ratios for each period: pre-COVID-19 pandemic, COVID 2020, COVID 2021, COVID 2022, and post-COVID-19 pandemic. To address the decrease in notifications during the COVID-19 pandemic, we tested 3 correction methods: (1) recoding COVID-19 years as missing; (2) imputing with the last pre-COVID-19 pandemic observation; and (3) imputing the historical moving average. Results: Between 2015-2023, a total of 74,990 notifications were reported in the Netherlands, of which 9,836 notifications (13%) occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Malaria, typhoid fever, hepatitis A, meningococcal infection, paratyphoid fever, Q-fever, shigellosis, measles, mumps, and pertussis had significantly lower notifications during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the duration and magnitude of the effect differed among the infections. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the notifications of malaria (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.17, 95% CI 0.08-0.36) and typhoid fever (IRR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.55) was only seen in 2020, while the notifications for measles (IRR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.75) and pertussis (IRR 0.34, 95% CI 0.20-0.60) were still significantly lower in the post-COVID-19 pandemic period. In addition, the newly calculated alarm thresholds showed a noticeable difference compared with the original unadjusted alarm thresholds. However, the variation among the 3 different corrected alarm thresholds was not substantial. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, notifications of 10 infectious diseases declined significantly. The duration of this decline varied among infections, highlighting the need for pattern-specific adjustments. Our study demonstrates that accounting for the reduced notifications impacts alarm threshold calculations for outbreak detection. We therefore recommend amending the alarm thresholds to account for this impact to ensure reliable outbreak detection, so that communicable disease control professionals can act in a timely and data-driven manner. The next step in the development of the "pandemic-proof" methodology is to determine which correction method is most suitable. Further validation by communicable disease control professionals is essential to assess the applicability of the adjusted alarm thresholds for outbreak detection.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksPopulation SurveillanceDisease NotificationHumansNetherlandsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 pandemicepidemiologyinfectious diseasesoutbreak detectionpublic health surveillanceroutine surveillance data

Identifiers

PMID40857622
PMCPMC12380364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.