ArticleAphasiology2024
Structural Priming in Aphasia: A State-of-the-Art Review and Future Directions.
Article in Aphasiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Priming Adjuncts in Sentence and Discourse Production in Neurotypical Adults and Persons With Aphasia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Structural Priming Treatment in Aphasia: The Role of Lexical and Abstract Syntactic Representations.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025Article
- Tracking priming-induced language recovery in aphasia with pre-trained language models.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Background & Aims: Decades of research on structural priming - speakers' tacit reuse of previously encountered syntactic structures in subsequent production and comprehension of sentences - has made substantial contributions to theories of syntactic representations, processing, and language learning and acquisition. There is growing interest in the application of structural priming to assess and facilitate language processing and learning in clinical populations. Yet, little research has explored structural priming in aphasia. The purpose of this paper is to provide a state-of-the art review of structural priming studies in aphasia and provide future research directions with an eye towards using structural priming for aphasia rehabilitation. Main contribution: Structural priming occurs not only in laboratory settings, but also in everyday speech, across many simple to complex grammatical structures, different languages, and throughout the lifespan. Importantly, a body of literature suggests that structural priming may reflect processes of implicit learning, strengthening the language user's ability to map messages and sentence structures. With respect to aphasia, existing studies have discovered that priming can help persons with aphasia (PWA) produce and comprehend more complex sentences that are otherwise difficult to produce or comprehend on their own. Additionally, priming effects transfer across production and comprehension modalities, and create long-lasting, cumulative improvements of sentence processing in PWA. Conclusions: The review of the literature suggests that structural priming can be used to assess PWA's ability to access various syntactic structures but also to intervene sentence production deficits in PWA. Future research is recommended to systematically investigate functions of structural priming for widespread recovery of aphasia beyond increasing syntactic complexity, to delineate essential tenants of structural priming intervention at both person and treatment levels, and to examine its use for cross-linguistic treatment of bi/multi-lingual aphasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.