ArticleAddiction research & theory2025
G-CHIME Framework to Examine Adolescent Addiction Recovery in Alternative Peer Groups: A Qualitative Analysis.
Article in Addiction research & theory, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Substance use, recovery capital, and social networks of adolescents recently initiating inpatient treatment.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Research examining mechanisms that underlie adolescent addiction recovery can help inform best practices for this at-risk group. Alternative Peer Groups (APGs) are recovery supports intending to facilitate positive peer connections and prosocial activities. Consistent with the G-CHIME framework (Ogilvie & Carson, 2022), theory suggests APGs enhance adolescent recovery through Connectedness with APG peers and leaders, leading to Growth, Hope, Identity, Meaning, and Empowerment. In this study, we conducted qualitative analyses using the G-CHIME framework to examine recovery processes among APG participants. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of interviews with former APG participants (n=14; 71% male; Results: G-CHIME generally mapped onto recovery processes but in several novel ways. For example, connection to APG peers/staff was integral to recovery for most, but not all participants. Transitioning from being selfish to selfless emerged as a key process mapping onto G-CHIME domains of Identity, Meaning, and Empowerment, often depicted through 'helping others' or becoming considerate. Motivation, although not a formal G-CHIME component, appeared throughout, suggesting this construct underlies many of the G-CHIME components. Conclusions: Using the G-CHIME framework may provide a more comprehensive understanding of youth recovery narratives. This enhanced understanding of pathways taken when participating in recovery support services may help program staff leverage such knowledge to increase engagement and positive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.